No, you're right. It's writers being weird. Or let's be nice and say "overly enthusiastic." [wry smile] I've wondered about that too, 'cause I don't know about anyone else but my nose works just great while I'm kissing, thanks ever so. :D
It probably came from the same source that has people writing about someone licking or kissing up the "seam" in a guy's cock. o_O I mean, while I'll admit my experience of the male anatomy isn't extensive enough to comprise a statistically valid sampling, still, I'm fairly sure that the only way a guy could acquire a "seam" in his cock is if he's had some fairly disturbing surgery, ya know? [eyeroll] But you see it all over. It's probably the same mutation that gives a guy "sacs," as in plural. [snicker]
My personal theory is that there are too many women writing smut who have insufficient experience of the real thing. :P
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2005-08-31 08:16 am (UTC)It probably came from the same source that has people writing about someone licking or kissing up the "seam" in a guy's cock. o_O I mean, while I'll admit my experience of the male anatomy isn't extensive enough to comprise a statistically valid sampling, still, I'm fairly sure that the only way a guy could acquire a "seam" in his cock is if he's had some fairly disturbing surgery, ya know? [eyeroll] But you see it all over. It's probably the same mutation that gives a guy "sacs," as in plural. [snicker]
My personal theory is that there are too many women writing smut who have insufficient experience of the real thing. :P
Angie