brainofck: (JDconf)
brainofck ([personal profile] brainofck) wrote2005-08-25 06:20 am

Thoughts?

I am writing a section now from General Hammond's point of view.

So is he George? Hammond? Gen. Hammond?

For instance, here we have the obligatory infirmary scene, where Jack is waking up for the first time de-goa'uld'ed. (Um. Yeah. That's a word.) Anyway, this is what it looks like when I write it from Jack's POV:

    "We don't know that for a fact, Colonel," General Hammond replied quietly.

    "Oh, he's dead, General. I gave the order to his First Prime myself. They shoved him out into space with ten mintues' of air."

    "Daniel's dead."

    General Hammond just shook his head.


But from Hammond's own POV?

    "We don't know that for a fact, Colonel," George replied quietly.

    "Oh, he's dead, General. I gave the order to his First Prime myself. They shoved him out into space with ten mintues' of air."

    "Daniel's dead."

    George just shook his head.


Do you see what I'm getting at? Usually when I write from one character's POV, even though I almost always write in the third person, I still feel like a tight POV is more intimate to the character, and should reflect what would go on inside that character's head. So Gen. Hammond, from his own POV ought to think of himself as himself, right? And that is not necessarily all caught up in the General business. I have no problem writing Jack as Jack, rather than Col. O'Neill... Just feels all weird to type George.

Hmmmm. Maybe I'll write it one way, see what people think in the feedback, then do a big revision if it doesn't work...

Heh. Now I want to post an inspirational picture of George, but it would take forever to find one download it, upload it, blah, blah... Eheheheh. Is there a [livejournal.com profile] hammond_daily? *snickers*

EDIT: OMG! Loving my new icons! Look at Jack and Daniel! They are listening so attentively to my musings about what to call George! Thought they both look like they might be *right* on the edge of exasperation! Tee hee!

Hush, you!

[identity profile] brainofck.livejournal.com 2005-08-31 02:55 am (UTC)(link)
there's no reason to have the second apostrophe in "de-goa'uld'ed"

Fie on you and your punctuation/spelling comment! *snert*

I think any hammond_daily should be called HammondofTexas... And I've done enough things lately to make people think I'm on drugs. And I swear, there's an ice cream-based Dark Muse-type story on the way. I start Hammond_Daily, and the men in white jackets will be waiting by the door in the morning...

Re: Hush, you!

[identity profile] angiepen.livejournal.com 2005-08-31 06:54 pm (UTC)(link)
Fie on you and your punctuation/spelling comment! *snert*

Hey, just doing my part to stem the horrible epidemic of Apostrophe Abuse sweeping through the English-speaking world. :P

Angie

Re: Hush, you!

[identity profile] brainofck.livejournal.com 2005-08-31 09:53 pm (UTC)(link)
So, what happens during apostrophe abuse? Sounds very naughty...

Re: Hush, you!

[identity profile] angiepen.livejournal.com 2005-08-31 10:34 pm (UTC)(link)
Nah -- not naughty, just messy and annoying. Hell, if it were naughty I wouldn't object. ;)

Angie